زمینه سازمانی، استفاده مدیریت عملکرد اعمال و اثرات آنهادر مورد عملکردسازمانی: در یک نگاه تجربی در این روابط متقابل

• Abrahamson, E. (1991), “Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 586-612.

• Abernethy, A. and Lillis, A. (2001), “Interdependencies in organization design: a test in hospitals”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 13, pp. 107-129.

• Aidemark, L. (2001), “The meaning of balanced scorecards in the health care organization”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 23-40, doi: 10.1111/1468-0408.00119.

• Almquist, R., Grossi, G., van Helden, G. and Reichard, C. (2013), “Public sector governance and accountability”, Critical Perspectives of Accounting, Vol. 7 No. 8, pp. 1-9.

• Arnaboldi, M. and Azzone, G. (2010), “Constructing performance measurement in the public sector”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 21, pp. 266-282.

• Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I. and Steccolini, I. (2015), “Performance management in the public sector: the ultimate challenge”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 1-22.

• Askim, J. (2004), “Performance management and organizational intelligence: adapting the balanced scorecard in Larvik municipality”, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 415-438.

• Ballantine, J., Brignall, S. and Modell, S. (1998), “Performance measurement and management in public health services: a comparison of UK and Swedish practice”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 71-94.

• Banker, R.D., Potter, G. and Srinivasan, D. (2000), “An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 65-92.

• Bisbe, J. and Otley, D. (2004), “The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 29 No. 8, pp. 709-737, doi: 10. 1016/j.aos.2003.10.010.

• Bispe, J., Batista-Foguet, J.M. and Chenhall, R. (2007), “Defining management accounting constructs: a methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification”, Accounting Organization and Society, Vol. 32 No. 7-8, pp. 789-820.

• Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J. (2008), Managing Performance: International Comparisons, Routledge, London.

• Bovens, M. (2005), “Public accountability”, in Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. and Pollitt, C. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

• Bozeman, B. (2019), “Public values: citizens’ perspective”, Public Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 817-838.

• Bracci, E., Maran, L. and Inglis, R. (2017), “Examining the process of performance measurement system design and implementation in two Italian public services”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 406-421.

• Brignall, S. and Modell, S. (2000), “An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 281-306.

• Budding, G.T. (2004), “Accountability, environmental uncertainty and government performance: evidence from Dutch municipalities”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 285-304.

• Burney, L. and Widener, S.K. (2007), “Strategic performance measurement systems, job-relevant information, and managerial behavioral responses – role stress and performance”, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 43-69.

• Burns, J. and Scapens, R.W. (2000), “Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 3-25.

• Carruthers, B.G. (1995), “Accounting, ambiguity and the new institutionalism”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 313-328.

• Cavalluzzo, K.S. and Ittner, C.D. (2004), “Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from government”, Accounting, Organization and Society, Vol. 29 Nos 3-4, pp. 243-267.

• Chenhall, R.H. (2003), “Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28 Nos 2-3, pp. 127-168.

• Chenhall, R.H. and Langfield-Smith, K. (1998), “The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 243-264.

• Cho, Y.J. and Lee, J.W. (2012), “Performance management and trust in supervisors”, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 236-259.

• Chong, V.K. (1996), “Management accounting systems, task uncertainty and managerial performance: a research note”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 415-421.

• Cunningham, G.M. and Harris, J. (2005), “Toward a theory of performance reporting to achieve public sector accountability: a field study”, Public Budgeting and Finance, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 15-42.

• Damanpour, F., Walker, R.M. and Avellaneda, C.N. (2009), “Combinative effects of Innovation types and Organizational Performance: a longitudinal study of service organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 650-675.

• DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1991), “The iron cage revisited. Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality”, in Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

• Ellwood, S. and Newberry, S. (2007), “Public sector accrual accounting: institutionalising neoliberal principles?”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 549-573.

• Feltham, G. and Xie, J. (1994), “Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 69 No. 3, pp. 429-453.

• Ferreira, A. and Otley, D. (2009), “The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 263-282.

• Geiger, R. and Ittner, C. (1996), “The influence of funding source and legislative requirements on government cost accounting practices”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 549-567.

• Gerdin, J. and Greve, J. (2008), “The appropriateness of statistical methods for testing contingency hypotheses in management accounting research”, Accounting, Organization and Society, Vol. 33 Nos 7-8, pp. 995-1009.

• Gibbons, D. and Chakraborti, S. (2003), Nonparametric Statistical Inference, Marcel Dekker, New York.

• Goddard, A. (2004), “Budgetary practices and accountability habitus: a grounded theory”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 543-577.

• Gomes, P., Mendes, S.M. and Carvalho, J. (2016), “Determinants of the design and use of PMS in Portuguese government agencies: a complementary theoretical approach”, in Ferreira, A., Azevedo, G., Oliveira, J. and Marques, R. (Eds), Global Perspectives on Risk Management and Accounting in the Public S