بررسی روایی و پایایی مقیاس تکانشگری آیزنک و موری و پرسشنامهی توجه تقسیم شده (DAQ) در دانشجویان دانشگاه اصفهان
Keywords:
تکانشگری, توجه, دانشجویانAbstract
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ: ﻫﺪف اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ رواﯾﯽ و ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ ﻣﻘﯿﺎس رﻓﺘﺎرﻫﺎي ﺗﮑﺎﻧﺸﯽ آﯾﺰﻧﮏ و ﻣﻮري و ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻧﺎﻣﻪي ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﯿﻢ ﺷﺪه (DAQ) در داﻧﺸﺠﻮﯾﺎن داﻧﺸﮕﺎه اﺻﻔﻬﺎن ﺑﻮد.
روشﮐﺎر: ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪي ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ، ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻤﺎم داﻧﺸﺠﻮﯾﺎن داﻧﺸﮕﺎه اﺻﻔﻬﺎن در ﺳﺎل ﺗﺤﺼﯿﻠﯽ 1403-1402 ﺑﻮد ﮐﻪ ﺗﻌﺪاد 200 ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ روش ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﮔﯿﺮي ﺗﺼﺎدﻓﯽ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪاي ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ي ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ، اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮر ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ رواﯾﯽ ﻫﻢزﻣﺎن ﻣﻘﯿﺎس ﺗﮑﺎﻧﺸﮕﺮي آﯾﺰﻧﮏ و ﻣﻮري و ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻧﺎﻣﻪي ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﯿﻢ ﺷﺪه، از ﻧﺴﺨﻪي ﯾﺎزدﻫﻢ ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻧﺎﻣﻪي ﺗﮑﺎﻧﺸﮕﺮي ﺑﺎرات اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪ. دادهﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺿﺮاﯾﺐ ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ آﻟﻔﺎي ﮐﺮوﻧﺒﺎخ و دوﻧﯿﻤﻪﺳﺎزي و ﻧﯿﺰ ﺿﺮاﯾﺐ ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﭘﯿﺮﺳﻮن و دورﺷﺘﻪاي- ﻧﻘﻄﻪاي ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ: ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﻧﺸﺎن داد رواﯾﯽ ﻫﻢزﻣﺎن ﻣﻘﯿﺎس ﺗﮑﺎﻧﺸﮕﺮي آﯾﺰﻧﮏ و ﻣﻮري و ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻧﺎﻣﻪي ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﯿﻢ ﺷﺪه ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﻣﻌﻨﯽدار ﺑﯿﻦ ﻧﻤﺮات ﻧﺴﺨﻪي ﯾﺎزدﻫﻢ ﻣﻘﯿﺎس ﺗﮑﺎﻧﺸﮕﺮي ﺑﺎرات ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺮات ﻣﻘﯿﺎس ﺗﮑﺎﻧﺸﮕﺮي آﯾﺰﻧﮏ و ﻣﻮري و ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻧﺎﻣﻪي ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﯿﻢ ﺷﺪه، ﺗﺎﯾﯿﺪ ﺷﺪ .(P<0/05) ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ دو ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﺿﺮاﯾﺐ آﻟﻔﺎي ﮐﺮوﻧﺒﺎخ و دوﻧﯿﻤﻪﺳﺎزي، ﺗﺎﯾﯿﺪ ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ. ﻫﻢﭼﻨﯿﻦ ﺑﯿﻦ ﺳﻦ، ﺟﻨﺴﯿﺖ، ﺗﺤﺼﯿﻼت و ﺗﺎﻫﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺮات دو ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻧﺎﻣﻪ، ﻫﯿﭻ راﺑﻄﻪي ﻣﻌﻨﯽ-داري ﺑﻪ دﺳﺖ ﻧﯿﺎﻣﺪ .(P>0/05)
ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪﮔﯿﺮي: ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ، ﻣﻘﯿﺎس ﺗﮑﺎﻧﺸﮕﺮي آﯾﺰﻧﮏ و ﻣﻮري و ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻧﺎﻣﻪي ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﯿﻢ ﺷﺪه از رواﯾﯽ و ﭘﺎﯾﺎﯾﯽ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺟﻬﺖ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده در ﺟﻤﻌﯿﺖ داﻧﺸﺠﻮﯾﺎن اﯾﺮاﻧﯽ ﺑﺮﺧﻮردارﻧﺪ.
Downloads
References
1. Berk LE. [Developmental psychology]. Seyed Mohammadi Y. (translator). Tehran: Arasbaran; 2013: 357. (Persian)
2. Claes L, Vertommen H, Braspenning N. Psychometric properties of the Dickman Impulsivity scale. Pers Indiv Diff 2000; 29: 27-35.
3. Dadsetan P. [Developmental psychopathology]. Tehran: Samt; 2010: 231. (Persian)
4. Diemen LV, Szobot CM, Kessler F, Pechansky F. [Adaptation and construct validation of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) to Brazilian Portuguese for use in adolescents]. Rev Bras Psiquiat 2007; 29(2): 153-6. (Spanish)
5. Ekhtiari H, Safaei H, Esmaeeli Javid G, Atefvahid MK, Edalati H, Mokri A. [Reliability and validity of Persian versions of Eysenck, Barratt, Dickman and Zuckerman questionnaires in assessing risky and impulsive behaviors]. Iranian journal of psychiatry and clinical psychology 2008; 3: 326-36. (Persian)
6. Halgin RP, Whitbourne SK. [Abnormal psychology]. Seyed Mohammadi Y. (translator). Tehran: Ravan Publications; 2013: 270. (Persian)
7. Lee SR, Lee WH, Park JS, Kim SM, Kim JW, Shim H. The study on reliability and validity of Korean version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11-Revised in nonclinical adult subjects. J Korean 2012; 51: 378-86.
8. Mulligan NW, Hartman M. Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory Cogn 1996; 24(4):453-65.
9. Revelle W. Extraversion and impulsivity. In: Nyborg H. (editor). The scientific study of human nature: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenckat eighty. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; 1997: 189-212.
10. Salthouse TA, Siedlecki KL. Reliability and validity of the divided attention questionnaire. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2005; 12:89-98.
11. Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understandimpulsivity. Pers Individ Diff 2001; 30: 669-89.
12. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: A review of an emerging area of research.Gait Posture 2002; 16: 1-14.
13. Tun PA, Wingfield A. Does dividing attention become harder with age? Findings from the divided attention questionnaire. Aging Cogn 1995; 2: 39-66.
