کاربرد نانومواد در تصفیه پساب میادین نفت و گاز
Keywords:
تصفیه پساب, نانو مواد, فتوکاتالیست, فناوری غشاییAbstract
پسابهای حاصل از استخراج نفت و گاز به جریانهای پسماندی اطلاق میشود که در فعالیتهای خاصی همچون حفاری و شکست هیدرولیکی تولید میشوند. این نوع فاضلابها معمولاً دارای ویژگیهایی نظیر شوری بسیار بالا، رنگ شدید، وجود ترکیبات سمی و خطرناک، زیستتجزیهناپذیری ضعیف و دشواری در تصفیه هستند. در این میان، نانومواد به دلیل ابعاد بسیار کوچک، سطح ویژه بالا و انرژی سطحی قابل توجه، توان بالقوه چشمگیری در فناوریهای نوین تصفیه آب از خود نشان دادهاند. تلفیق فناوری نانو با مواد غشایی در تصفیه آب، امکان تولید غشاهای نانوالیافی با اندازه حفره کنترلشده و تخلخل بالا را فراهم ساخته که این ویژگیها نقش بسزایی در جداسازی مؤثر فازهای آب و نفت دارند. این مرور علمی، کاربردهای کلیدی نانومواد در فرآیند تصفیه پسابهای نفت و گاز را با تمرکز بر دو حوزه اصلی فناوری جداسازی غشایی و فناوری فوتوکاتالیستی بررسی میکند. در حوزه جداسازی غشایی، انواع تکنولوژیها از جمله اولترافیلتراسیون (UF)، نانوفیلتراسیون (NF) و اسمز معکوس (RO) مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتهاند. همچنین، استفاده از فناوری فوتوکاتالیز نیمهرسانا مبتنی بر TiO₂ در تجزیه ترکیبات آلاینده موجود در پسابهای نفتی بهصورت دقیق مطالعه شده است. در پایان، این مقاله چشماندازهای نوین و روندهای توسعهای آینده نانومواد در حوزه تصفیه پسابهای نفت و گاز را نیز ترسیم میکند.
Downloads
References
1. Yue, P., et al., The latest progress of shale gas exploration and development in China. Nat. Gas Explor. Dev, 2017. 40: p. 38-44.
2. Dong, D., et al., Discussion on the exploration & development prospect of shale gas in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry B, 2015. 2(1): p. 9-23.
3. Sun, Y., et al., A critical review of risks, characteristics, and treatment strategies for potentially toxic elements in wastewater from shale gas extraction. Environment international, 2019. 125: p. 452-469.
4. Kassotis, C.D., S.C. Nagel, and H.M. Stapleton, Unconventional oil and gas chemicals and wastewater-impacted water samples promote adipogenesis via PPARγ-dependent and independent mechanisms in 3T3-L1 cells. Science of the Total Environment, 2018. 640: p. 1601-1610.
5. Rowan, E.L., et al., Geochemical and isotopic evolution of water produced from Middle Devonian Marcellus shale gas wells, Appalachian basin, Pennsylvania. Aapg Bulletin, 2015. 99(2): p. 181-206.
6. Bakke, T., J. Klungsøyr, and S. Sanni, Environmental impacts of produced water and drilling waste discharges from the Norwegian offshore petroleum industry. Marine environmental research, 2013. 92: p. 154-169.
7. Cozzarelli, I.M., et al., Environmental signatures and effects of an oil and gas wastewater spill in the Williston Basin, North Dakota. Science of The Total Environment, 2017. 579: p. 1781-1793.
8. Atkinson, G.M., et al., Hydraulic fracturing and seismicity in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Seismological research letters, 2016. 87(3): p. 631-647.
9. Sharghi, E.A., B. Bonakdarpour, and M. Pakzadeh, Treatment of hypersaline produced water employing a moderately halophilic bacterial consortium in a membrane bioreactor: effect of salt concentration on organic removal performance, mixed liquor characteristics and membrane fouling. Bioresource technology, 2014. 164: p. 203-213.
10. Munirasu, S., M.A. Haija, and F. Banat, Use of membrane technology for oil field and refinery produced water treatment—A review. Process safety and environmental protection, 2016. 100: p. 183-202.
11. Liu, X., et al., The perspective and challenge of nanomaterials in oil and gas wastewater treatment. Molecules, 2021. 26(13): p. 3945.
12. Padaki, M., et al., Membrane technology enhancement in oil–water separation. A review. Desalination, 2015. 357: p. 197-207.
13. Ulbricht, M., Advanced functional polymer membranes. Polymer, 2006. 47(7): p. 2217-2262.
14. Zhang, T., et al., One-step preparation of tubular nanofibers and micro/nanospheres covered membrane with 3D micro/nano structure for highly efficient emulsified oil/water separation. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2021. 122: p. 210-221.
15. Raji, Y.O., et al., Wettability improvement of ceramic membrane by intercalating nano-Al2O3 for oil and water separation. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2021. 25: p. 101178.
16. Velayi, E. and R. Norouzbeigi, A mesh membrane coated with dual-scale superhydrophobic nano zinc oxide: Efficient oil-water separation. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2020. 385: p. 125394.
17. Li, Z., et al., Three-channel stainless steel hollow fiber membrane with inner layer modified by nano-TiO2 coating method for the separation of oil-in-water emulsions. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019. 222: p. 75-84.
18. Fang, X., et al., Polymeric ultrafiltration membrane with in situ formed nano-silver within the inner pores for simultaneous separation and catalysis. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019. 579: p. 190-198.
19. Pan, J., et al., ECTFE hybrid porous membrane with hierarchical micro/nano-structural surface for efficient oil/water separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017. 524: p. 623-630.
20. Zhang, Y., et al., Membrane technology in wastewater treatment enhanced by functional nanomaterials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 197: p. 339-348.
21. Cui, J., et al., Bio-inspired fabrication of superhydrophilic nanocomposite membrane based on surface modification of SiO2 anchored by polydopamine towards effective oil-water emulsions separation. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019. 209: p. 434-442.
22. Chen, L., et al., Graphene oxide based membrane intercalated by nanoparticles for high performance nanofiltration application. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018. 347: p. 12-18.
23. Song, Z., et al., TiO2 nanofiltration membranes prepared by molecular layer deposition for water purification. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016. 510: p. 72-78.
24. Weschenfelder, S.E., et al., Evaluation of ceramic membranes for oilfield produced water treatment aiming reinjection in offshore units. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015. 131: p. 51-57.
25. Weschenfelder, S., C. Borges, and J. Campos, Oilfield produced water treatment by ceramic membranes: Bench and pilot scale evaluation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015. 495: p. 242-251.
26. Da, X., et al., Preparation of zirconia nanofiltration membranes through an aqueous sol–gel process modified by glycerol for the treatment of wastewater with high salinity. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016. 504: p. 29-39.
27. Lu, Y., et al., Fabrication of TiO2-doped ZrO2 nanofiltration membranes by using a modified colloidal sol-gel process and its application in simulative radioactive effluent. Journal of membrane science, 2016. 514: p. 476-486.
28. Riley, S.M., et al., Hybrid membrane bio-systems for sustainable treatment of oil and gas produced water and fracturing flowback water. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016. 171: p. 297-311.
29. Al-Sabahi, J., et al., Visible light photocatalytic degradation of HPAM polymer in oil produced water using supported zinc oxide nanorods. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018. 351: p. 56-64.
30. Grzechulska, J., M. Hamerski, and A.W. Morawski, Photocatalytic decomposition of oil in water. Water Research, 2000. 34(5): p. 1638-1644.
31. Bessa, E., G.L. Sant’Anna Jr, and M. Dezotti, Photocatalytic/H2O2 treatment of oil field produced waters. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2001. 29(2): p. 125-134.
32. Fujisawa, J.-i., T. Eda, and M. Hanaya, Comparative study of conduction-band and valence-band edges of TiO2, SrTiO3, and BaTiO3 by ionization potential measurements. Chemical Physics Letters, 2017. 685: p. 23-26.
33. Ng, K.H., Adoption of TiO2-photocatalysis for palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) and its practicality against traditional treatment in Malaysia. Chemosphere, 2021. 270: p. 129378.
34. Ziolli, R.L. and W.F. Jardim, Photocatalytic decomposition of seawater-soluble crude-oil fractions using high surface area colloid nanoparticles of TiO2. Journal of photochemistry and photobiology A: Chemistry, 2002. 147(3): p. 205-212.
35. Saien, J. and H. Nejati, Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of pollutants in petroleum refinery wastewater under mild conditions. Journal of hazardous materials, 2007. 148(1-2): p. 491-495.
36. Wan, L.P., et al., Photocatalytic oxidation degradation behavior on fracturing wastewater in oilfield. Advanced Materials Research, 2012. 396: p. 1918-1922.
37. Ni, L., et al., Novel floating photocatalysts based on polyurethane composite foams modified with silver/titanium dioxide/graphene ternary nanoparticles for the visible‐light‐mediated remediation of diesel‐polluted surface water. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2016. 133(19).
38. Ghasemi, Z., H. Younesi, and A.A. Zinatizadeh, Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic application of TiO2/Fe-ZSM-5 nanocomposite for the treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater: Optimization of process parameters by response surface methodology. Chemosphere, 2016. 159: p. 552-564.
39. Shahrezaei, F., et al., Process modeling and kinetic evaluation of petroleum refinery wastewater treatment in a photocatalytic reactor using TiO2 nanoparticles. Powder Technology, 2012. 221: p. 203-212.
40. Wang, X., et al., Synthesis of expanded graphite C/C composites (EGC) based Ni-N-TiO2 floating photocatalysts for in situ adsorption synergistic photocatalytic degradation of diesel oil. Journal of photochemistry and photobiology A: chemistry, 2017. 347: p. 105-115.
41. Brame, J.A., et al., Photocatalytic pre-treatment with food-grade TiO2 increases the bioavailability and bioremediation potential of weathered oil from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Chemosphere, 2013. 90(8): p. 2315-2319.
42. Zielińska-Jurek, A., et al., Magnetic semiconductor photocatalysts for the degradation of recalcitrant chemicals from flow back water. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017. 195: p. 157-165.
43. Łabuz, P., et al., Photogeneration of reactive oxygen species over ultrafine TiO 2 particles functionalized with rutin–ligand induced sensitization and crystallization effects. Research on Chemical Intermediates, 2019. 45: p. 5781-5800.
44. Alizadeh Fard, M., B. Aminzadeh, and H. Vahidi, Degradation of petroleum aromatic hydrocarbons using TiO2 nanopowder film. Environmental technology, 2013. 34(9): p. 1183-1190.
45. Xie, L., Modeling and computation in engineering II. Vol. 7. 2013: CRC Press Boca Raton, FL.
46. Fan, Q., H. He, and Y. Wang, Research Progress of Drilling Wastewater and Acidification Fracturing Operation Wastewater Treatment Technology. J. Oil Field Chemistry, 2002. 19(4): p. 387.
47. Chong, M.N., et al., Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water research, 2010. 44(10): p. 2997-3027.
48. Cheng, C.K., et al., Preparation of titania doped argentum photocatalyst and its photoactivity towards palm oil mill effluent degradation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016. 112: p. 1128-1135.
49. Cheng, C.K., M.R. Derahman, and M.R. Khan, Evaluation of the photocatalytic degradation of pre-treated palm oil mill effluent (POME) over Pt-loaded titania. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2015. 3(1): p. 261-270.
50. Khan, E., C. Huang, and B.E. Reed, Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies. 2003, JSTOR.
51. Zhang, J., et al., Floating photocatalysts based on loading Bi/N-doped TiO 2 on expanded graphite C/C (EGC) composites for the visible light degradation of diesel. RSC Advances, 2015. 5(88): p. 71922-71931.
52. Gaya, U.I. and A.H. Abdullah, Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems. Journal of photochemistry and photobiology C: Photochemistry reviews, 2008. 9(1): p. 1-12.
53. Cazoir, D., et al., Hydrocarbon removal from bilgewater by a combination of air-stripping and photocatalysis. Journal of hazardous materials, 2012. 235: p. 159-168.
54. Wang, S., et al., Fracturing fluid waste liquid disposal by using nanometer TiO 2 in He Nan oilfield. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2006. 23(4): p. 65-68.
55. Mascolo, G., et al., Photocatalytic degradation of methyl red by TiO2: Comparison of the efficiency of immobilized nanoparticles versus conventional suspended catalyst. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007. 142(1-2): p. 130-137.
56. Chen, Y. and K. Liu, RETRACTED: Preparation of granulated N-doped TiO2/diatomite composite and its applications of visible light degradation and disinfection. 2016, Elsevier.
57. Yang, T., Z.-F. Ma, and Q.-Y. Yang, Formation and performance of Kaolin/MnO2 bi-layer composite dynamic membrane for oily wastewater treatment: Effect of solution conditions. Desalination, 2011. 270(1-3): p. 50-56.
58. Ren, W., et al., Low temperature preparation and visible light photocatalytic activity of mesoporous carbon-doped crystalline TiO2. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2007. 69(3-4): p. 138-144.
59. Shao, G.N., et al., Sol–gel synthesis of vanadium doped titania: Effect of the synthetic routes and investigation of their photocatalytic properties in the presence of natural sunlight. Applied Surface Science, 2015. 351: p. 1213-1223.
