From the Byronic Hero to Nietzsche’s Übermensch: A Critical Review of Comparative Studies on Nihilism

Authors

  • Mohammad Hosseinzadehfard Payame Noor University, Shiraz Branch Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22170445

Keywords:

Byronic Hero, Nietzsche, Nihilism

Abstract

This paper explores a philosophical-literary question: can Lord Byron and Friedrich Nietzsche be seen as existential twins, each a solitary rider in his own realm, one in literature, the other in philosophy? Both faced the crisis of nihilism, defined by Nietzsche as the collapse of the highest values. Byron’s poetic persona, especially the Byronic Hero, seems to reflect Nietzsche’s concept of the Übermensch: a figure who embraces the void but resists it actively. Through a critical review of past comparative studies, this article highlights how Byron’s rebellious spirit through the Byronic Hero and Nietzsche’s active nihilism through the Übermensch intersect. It also points out the limitations of previous research, which often focused only on Manfred and Nietzsche’s own views of Byron, and which remained abstract without offering practical cultural insights. The paper concludes by suggesting a new direction: future studies should explore nihilism in love and desire, here called “romantic nihilism”, where Byron’s Don Juan and Nietzsche’s Dionysus provide richer models for confronting meaninglessness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Mohammad Hosseinzadehfard, Payame Noor University, Shiraz Branch

       

References

[1] Nietzsche, F. (1968). The Will to Power. Trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. Vintage.

[2] Nietzsche, F. (2007). The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings. Ed. Raymond Geuss and Ronald Speirs. Cambridge UP.

[3] Byron, L. (2000). Lord Byron: The Major Works. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford UP.

[4] Russell, B. (1957). A History of Western Philosophy. Popular Book Services, New Delhi.

[5] Summers, J. L. (1969). Lord Byron and Modern Existentialism. MA Thesis, Texas Technological College.

[6] Sokhanvar, J. (2022). The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Abridged ed. Eshtiaq Noor.

[7] Thatcher, D. S. (1980s). Nietzsche and Byron. University of Victoria. Available online at PhilPapers/Scribd.

[8] Wolfson, S. J. (1987). “‘Their She Condition’: Cross-Dressing and the Politics of Gender in Don Juan.” ELH, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 585–617.

[9] Camus, A. (1991). The Myth of Sisyphus. Trans. Justin O’Brien. Vintage International.

[10] Luyster, R. (2001). “Nietzsche/Dionysus: Ecstasy, Heroism, and the Monstrous.” Journal of Nietzsche Studies, No. 21, pp. 1–26.

[11] Kinzel, T. (2009). “Lord Byron’s Manfred, Nietzsche and Philosophy’s ‘Fatal Truth.’” Comparatio, 1/2, pp. 321–338.

[12] Panagopoulos, N. (2013). “The Byronic Hero and Nietzsche’s Übermensch: Conflicted Responses to Modernity.” Academia.edu.

[13] [13] Keena, J. (2014). Byron’s Manfred and Nietzsche’s Overman: A Critical Comparison. Academia.edu, available at: https://www.academia.edu/

[14] Nietzsche, F. (2024). On the Dramatic Poems of Byron. Independently published.

[15] Krupa, H. (2025). “The Oriental Woman as Objet Petit a: Subverting Orientalist Fantasies in Lord Byron’s Don Juan.” Fe Dergi, pp. 326–357.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-20

How to Cite

From the Byronic Hero to Nietzsche’s Übermensch: A Critical Review of Comparative Studies on Nihilism. (2026). Development Engineering Conferences Center Articles Database, 3(10). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22170445