Anomaly Detection in Road-Tanker Fuel Transport: A Deep Learning and Simulation Study

Authors

  • Naemeh Mohammadpour Amirkabir University of Technology Author

Keywords:

Fuel theft detection, BiLSTM, Attention mechanism, LSTM Autoencoder, Random Forest

Abstract

Fuel theft in road-tanker fleets is challenging to detect due to scarce labels, sensor noise, and distribution shifts. We present a reproducible, simulation-driven framework that combines a configurable trip simulator (geofence, speed, tank level, and outflow with realistic noise) with two detection strategies. An unsupervised LSTM Autoencoder (AE) is trained on normal windows to produce anomaly-sensitive auxiliary features. On top of these, we build: (i) an end-to-end BiLSTM+Attention model (Seq-Attn) that fuses temporal context with auxiliary features, and (ii) a hybrid LSTM+RF approach that encodes each window with an LSTM and classifies the embedding via a Random Forest. We evaluate on three scenarios---Baseline, Class Imbalance, and Distribution Shift---using trip-wise splits and theft-centric metrics (Precision, Recall, F1, PR-AUC, ROC-AUC). Results show both models achieve near-perfect detection in the baseline. Under imbalance and shift, Seq-Attn achieves consistently higher recall with almost perfect precision, while LSTM+RF remains competitive but misses slightly more thefts. These findings suggest using Seq-Attn as the primary detector, with LSTM+RF as a supplementary model for interpretability and ensemble robustness. All code and artifacts are released for end-to-end reproducibility and future validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Naemeh Mohammadpour, Amirkabir University of Technology

                   

References

[1] Bishop, C. M., & Nasrabadi, N. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning (Vol. 4,

No. 4, p. 738). New York: springer.

[2] Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., & Franklin, J. (2005). The elements of statistical

learning: data mining, inference and prediction. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 27(2), 83-85.

[3] Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (Vol. 1, No. 1,

pp. 9—11). Cambridge: MIT press.

[4] Mohammadpour, N., Fozi, M., Ebadzadeh, M. M., Azimi, A., & Kamali, A. (2024). Proximal

Policy Optimization with Adaptive Generalized Advantage Estimate. In Proceedings of the First

International Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery (MLKD 2024). (pp.

453—458).

[5] Barbado, A., & Corcho, Ó. (2022). Interpretable machine learning models for predicting and

explaining vehicle fuel consumption anomalies. Engineering Applications of Artificial

Intelligence, 115, 105222.

[6] Mulongo, J., Atemkeng, M., Ansah-Narh, T., Rockefeller, R., Nguegnang, G. M., & Garuti, M.

A. (2020). Anomaly detection in power generation plants using machine learning and neural

networks. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 34(1), 64-79.

[7] Atemkeng, M., Osanyindoro, V., Rockefeller, R., Hamlomo, S., Mulongo, J., Ansah-Narh, T., ...

& Fadja, A. N. (2023). Label assisted autoencoder for anomaly detection in power generation

plants. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02896.

[8] Shi, J., Gao, Y., Gu, D., Li, Y., & Chen, K. (2023). A novel approach to detect electricity theft

based on conv-attentional Transformer Neural Network. International Journal of Electrical

Power & Energy Systems, 145, 108642.

[9] Lilhore, U. K., Dalal, S., Radulescu, M., & Barbulescu, M. (2025). Smart grid stability

prediction model using two-way attention based hybrid deep learning and MPSO. Energy

Exploration & Exploitation, 43(1), 142-168.

[10] Zhang, X., Shi, J., Yang, M., Huang, X., Usmani, A. S., Chen, G., ... & Li, J. (2023). Real-time

pipeline leak detection and localization using an attention-based LSTM approach. Process

Safety and Environmental Protection, 174, 460-472.

[11] Khattak, A., Bukhsh, R., Aslam, S., Yafoz, A., Alghushairy, O., & Alsini, R. (2022). A hybrid

deep learning-based model for detection of electricity losses using big data in power

systems. Sustainability, 14(20), 13627.

[12] Collier, C., & Guha, K. (2025). Lightweight LSTM Model for Energy Theft Detection via Input

Data Reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02872.

[13] Hashmi, A., Barukab, O. M., & Hamza Osman, A. (2024). A hybrid feature weighted attention

based deep learning approach for an intrusion detection system using the random forest

algorithm. Plos one, 19(5), e0302294.

[14] Arapidis, E., Temenos, N., Giagkos, D., Rallis, I., Kalogeras, D., Papadakis, N., ... & C.

Messinis, S. (2024, June). Zeekflow+: A Deep LSTM Autoencoder with Integrated Random

Forest Classifier for Binary and Multi-class Classification in Network Traffic Data.

In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to

Assistive Environments (pp. 613-618).

[15] Takele, A. K., & Villányi, B. (2022, May). Anomaly detection using hybrid learning for

industrial IoT. In 2022 IEEE 2nd Conference on Information Technology and Data Science

(CITDS) (pp. 262-266).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-22

How to Cite

Anomaly Detection in Road-Tanker Fuel Transport: A Deep Learning and Simulation Study. (2025). Development Engineering Conferences Center Articles Database, 2(8). https://pubs.bcnf.ir/index.php/Articles/article/view/795

Similar Articles

1-10 of 79

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.