Deepfakes in Iranian Private Law: An Analytical Exploration of Legal, Technical, and Social Challenges
Keywords:
Deepfakes, Civil Liability, Artificial Intelligence, Iranian Private LawAbstract
Deepfake technology, utilizing artificial intelligence to produce highly realistic yet fabricated multimedia content, presents a significant challenge to Iran’s private law framework, particularly in addressing civil liability. This study highlights a critical knowledge gap in Iranian legal systems where the Civil Liability Act of 1960 struggles to address the complexities of proving fault and quantifying non material damages caused by anonymous and transnational deepfake distribution. The main research question is: How can Iran’s private law regulate civil liability for deepfakes to balance technological advancement with the protection of individual rights? The aim is to propose a comprehensive regulatory framework by analyzing Iran’s legal shortcomings through a qualitative and comparative methodology, drawing on international models like the European Union’s AI Act and China’s mandatory labeling regulations. The novelty lies in integrating Islamic jurisprudential principles, such as La Zarar (the prohibition of actions that result in damage or injury to others), Itlaf (Wasting) and Tasbib (Causation), to reform legal approaches, alongside advocating for detection technologies and media literacy. The findings highlight a pressing need for customized legal reforms to address the intricate legal, technological, and societal challenges posed by deepfakes in Iran. Without targeted measures, the risks of unchecked deepfake proliferation threaten to undermine individual rights and public trust.
Downloads
References
[1] Malakouti, R. (2020). How to apply the Pillars of Civil Liability in the Cyberspace of Instagram. Communication Research, 27(101), 143-157. doi: 10.22082/cr.2020.116275.1943
[2] Gupta, S. (2023). Deepfakes and intellectual property: Emerging legal dilemmas. International Journal of Technology Law, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 132-155.
[3] Kugler, M. B., Pace, C. (2021). Deepfakes and the law: Privacy, publicity, and emotional harm. Stanford Law Review, vol. 73, no. 3, p. 620-666.
[4] Vinogradov, A., Kuznetsova, E. (2024). Global approaches to regulating deepfakes: A comparative analysis. Comparative Law Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 217-237.
[5] Bosman, J., Smith, A., Taylor, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the rise of deepfakes: Technical and ethical challenges. Journal of Digital Ethics, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 260-263.
[6] Hossain, M. (2024). Civil liability in the digital age: Addressing deepfake harms. Asian Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 2267-2272.
[7] Demkin, V. (2024). Regulating AI in the European Union: A comparative legal perspective. European Law Review, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 73-87.
[8] Zhang, A. H. (2025). The promise and perils of China's regulation of artificial intelligence. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 63, no. 1, p. 3-51.
[9] Herke, Csongor. (2023). Deepfake: blessing or curse? legal regulatory aspects. Pro Futuro: Jovo Nemzedekek Joga, 2023(1), 157-178.
[10] Smith, H., & Mansted, K. (2020). Weaponised Deep Fakes: National Security and Democracy. Australian Strategic Policy Institute, International Cyber Policy Centre.
[11] Kulkarni, Vaishnavi, & Sivaramachandran, Bhanusshre. (2024). Tackling the multifaceted legal dilemmas of deep fake technology. Jus Corpus Law Journal, 4(3), 217-230.
[12] Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (pp. 2672–2680).
[13] Tolosana, R., et al. (2020). Deepfakes and beyond: A survey of face manipulation. IEEE Access, p. 3-8.
[14] Thies, J., Zollhöfer, M., Stamminger, M., Theobalt, C., & Nießner, M. (2016). Face2Face: Real-time face capture and reenactment of RGB videos. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 35(4), Article 41, 1–14.
[15] Karras, T., et al. (2019). A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p. 7-10.
[16] Vyas, Anoo Dinesh. (2024). United states of deepfake. Tennessee Law Review, 92(1), 307-354.
[17] Mullen, Molly. (2022). new reality: deepfake technology and the world around us. Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 48(1), 210-234.
[18] Tiwari, R. (2024). Deepfakes in the entertainment industry: Opportunities and legal challenges. Media and Law Review, vol. 15, no. 15(1), 42-48.
[19] Healy, J. (2025). Deepfakes and the law: Addressing the legal challenges of AI-generated content. Journal of Technology and Law, 12(3), 518-553.
[20] Interesse, G. (2022, December 20). China to regulate deep synthesis (deepfake) technology starting 2023. China Briefing. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-to-regulate-deep-synthesis-deep-fake-technology-starting-january-2023/
[21] Kugler, M. B., & Preminger, L. (2024). Deepfakes in entertainment: Redefining publicity rights. Harvard Journal of Entertainment Law, 45(2), 828-833.
