A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Supplier Selection and Bullwhip Effect Mitigation: Case of Haierplast Factory

Authors

  • Reza Soltani Department of Industrial Engineering, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran Author
  • Setareh Sedaghat Department of Industrial Engineering, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran Author
  • Niloufar Raisi Department of Industrial Engineering, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran Author
  • Mehrdad Nikbakht Department of Industrial Engineering, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran Author

Keywords:

Bullwhip Effect, Supplier Selection, Fuzzy AHP, Dynamic DEMATEL

Abstract

The bullwhip effect, as one of the major challenges in supply chain management, amplifies demand fluctuations at upstream levels and disrupts coordination and operational efficiency. This study develops a hybrid framework based on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to select optimal suppliers for Haierplast Factory engaged in the production of primary plastic components for household appliances and to mitigate the bullwhip effect. the research integrates the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP), the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The framework is further enhanced through the incorporation of fuzzy logic, dynamic analysis, and novel criteria, namely environmental sustainability and operational flexibility. Four real-world suppliers (Jam Petrochemical, Baspar Shimi, Marun Petrochemical, and Pouya Polymer) are evaluated against criteria including delivery time, operating cost, service quality, operational flexibility, and environmental sustainability. The findings reveal that Baspar Shimi is the most suitable supplier due to its superior performance in delivery time and flexibility. Simulation and sensitivity analysis confirm a 15% reduction in demand deviation. By offering a generalizable approach, this framework contributes to the supply chain management literature and provides a strategic tool for manufacturing industries operating in similar contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Reza Soltani, Department of Industrial Engineering, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

       

  • Setareh Sedaghat , Department of Industrial Engineering, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

      

  • Niloufar Raisi, Department of Industrial Engineering, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

      

  • Mehrdad Nikbakht, Department of Industrial Engineering, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

       

References

[1] Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (6th ed.). Pearson.

[2] Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546–558.

[3] Wang, J., & Disney, S. M. (2016). The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), 691–701.

[4] Brun, A., Karaosman, H., & Teodosio, B. (2020). Supply chain collaboration for transparency. Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4429

[5] Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.

[6] Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.

[7] Lin, R.-J. (2013). Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 32–39.

[8] Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer.

[9] Ortiz-Barrios, M. A., Cabarcas-Reyes, J., Ishizaka, A., Barbati, M., Jaramillo-Rueda, J., & Carrasco-González, H. (2019). A case of food supply chain management with AHP, DEMATEL, and TOPSIS. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 26(5–6), 283–303.

[10] Memari, A., Dargi, A., Akbari Jokar, M. R., Ahmad, R., & Abdul Rahim, A. R. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 9–24

[11] Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83

[12] Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686–1698

[13] Song, H., & Zhang, D. (2025). Bullwhip effect in supply chains and cost rigidity. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(5), 284

[14] Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. MIT Press.

[15] Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24

[16] Kannan, D., Khodaverdi, R., Olfat, L., Jafarian, A., & Diabat, A. (2014). Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production

[17] Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252–264

Downloads

Published

2025-03-15

How to Cite

A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Supplier Selection and Bullwhip Effect Mitigation: Case of Haierplast Factory. (2025). Development Engineering Conferences Center Articles Database, 2(6). https://pubs.bcnf.ir/index.php/Articles/article/view/1342

Similar Articles

1-10 of 116

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.